Legal Opinion

Canton Morris Plan Bank v. Most

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided November 16, 1932PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SHERICK, PJ.

The issues presented are two in number, the first being, Is the appellant, as assignee of the bank’s second mortgage, entitled to be subrogated to and placed in the position of the bank, first held, by its canceled first mortgage, and' the second issue being, Is the appellant entitled to subrogation for the balance of the $10,500 paid by Most to workmen and materialmen for labor performed and materials furnished in the construction of the buildings, for which liens were not taken, and further entitled to share with the mechanics’ lien-holders, appellees herein, in the distribution…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fidelity Insurance, Trust & Safe Deposit Co. v. Shenandoah Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Virginia · 1889
  2. Coshocton Natl. Bank v. HagansOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  3. Harter Bank v. CooperOhio Court of Appeals · 1931
  4. Union Trust Co. v. LessovitzOhio Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. State v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Richards v. Security Pacific National BankCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
  3. Hyde Park Lumber Co. v. West Norwood Building & Loan Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
  4. ABN AMRO Mortgage Group, Inc. v. KangahOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  5. Washington Mutual Bank, FA v. AultmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2007

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API