State v. Holstun
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KLEINSCHMIDT, Judge.
The sole issue on this appeal is whether the trial court’s failure to comply with *197A.R.S. § 13-702(C)1 and articulate on the record the aggravating circumstances which justified imposing a stipulated sentence which exceeded the presumptive term requires a remand for resentencing. We conclude that it does.
The appellant was charged with armed robbery, a class 2 and dangerous felony and, pursuant to a plea agreement, he entered a plea of guilty to a reduced charge of armed robbery, a class 2 nondangerous offense, and agreed to a stipulated sentence of 10 years…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. BilesOregon Supreme Court · 1979
- State v. MahlerArizona Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- State v. ScottCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. HarrisonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
- State v. HarrisonArizona Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. HolstunCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
- State v. SolanoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1985
- State v. YbarraCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1986
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.