State v. Biles
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtHowell, J.
The 1977 Legislative Assembly extensively revised Oregon’s statutory scheme relating to sentencing of criminal defendants and appellate review of sentences. The question presented on this appeal is whether or not the statutory requirements of a presen-tence report 2 and a statement of reasons for the sentence 3 are mandatory.
Pursuant to a negotiated plea to a charge of unauthorized use of a motor vehicle, the defendant entered a plea of no contest. Also pursuant to the negotiated plea, and the recommendation of the district attorney, the court sentenced the defendant to the custody of the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. DinkelCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- People v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. ButchekOregon Supreme Court · 1927
- Bordewick v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. FisherCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- State v. CloutierOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. GarciaOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ClevengerOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. SpeedisOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Roy Branch v. Hoyt C. Cupp, Superintendent Oregon State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.