Legal Opinion

Marine Creek Partners, Ltd. v. Caldwell

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 5, 1996No. 2-94-190-CVPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOE L. DRAUGHN, Justice (Assigned).

This is a personal injury case. The issue is whether the parties to a swing set sales contract clearly intended to confer third-party beneficiary status on the users of the swing set. We hold that they did not. Accordingly, we reverse and render judgment that appellees take nothing on their contract claims.

Richard Caldwell, a thirteen-year-old boy, was swinging on the swing set at his apartment complex when the swing came loose from the frame because the chain separated from the “S” hook. Richard broke his ankle in the fall. His parents, Steve and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sage Street Associates v. Northdale Construction Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Corpus Christi Bank and Trust v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1975
  3. MJR Corp. v. B & B VENDING CO., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1988
  4. Harkey v. Texas Employers InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Temple EasTex, Inc. v. Old Orchard Creek Partners, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Ortega v. City National Bank, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2003
  2. Esquivel v. Murray Guard, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1999
  3. UMLIC VP LLC v. T & M Sales & Environmental Systems, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2005
  4. Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  5. EOG Resources, Inc. v. James R. Hurt, Jr., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2011

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API