Legal Opinion

United States v. George Thunderhawk

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided June 21, 2017No. 16-1914PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LOKEN, Circuit Judge.

In 2014, a jury found George Thunder-hawk guilty of abusive sexual contact of V.R.B., a child under 12 years of age, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(5). At sentencing, V.R.B.’s mother testified in support of restitution for the victim’s medical expenses. The Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) stated that restitution is mandatory for Thunderhawk’s offense. The district court 1 noted that restitution was owed and scheduled a hearing sixty days after sentencing to determine the amount to be awarded. Before that hearing, Thunderhawk appealed, which stayed…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  4. United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  5. United States v. ChalupnikCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. NIED (TYLER) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022
  2. United States v. CardozoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
  3. United States v. Carstie ClausenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. United States v. Carstie ClausenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API