United States v. George Thunderhawk
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LOKEN, Circuit Judge.
In 2014, a jury found George Thunder-hawk guilty of abusive sexual contact of V.R.B., a child under 12 years of age, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244(a)(5). At sentencing, V.R.B.’s mother testified in support of restitution for the victim’s medical expenses. The Presentence Investigation Report (“PSR”) stated that restitution is mandatory for Thunderhawk’s offense. The district court 1 noted that restitution was owed and scheduled a hearing sixty days after sentencing to determine the amount to be awarded. Before that hearing, Thunderhawk appealed, which stayed…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Paroline v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Dolan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
- United States v. SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. ChalupnikCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- NIED (TYLER) v. STATENevada Supreme Court · 2022
- United States v. CardozoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Carstie ClausenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Carstie ClausenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020