City of Wayzata v. County of Hennepin
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Thomas Gallagher, Justice.
Action by the city of Wayzata against the village of Minnetonka1 for a declaratory judgment that plaintiff city is entitled to certain taxes levied by the town of Minnetonka against property which was subsequently annexed by the city. The village of Minnetonka, which was formed from the remnants of the town of Minnetonka after such annexation, answered, claiming it was entitled to the taxes in question. *104Subsequently, after a stipulation as to the facts had been entered into by all parties, the defendant village moved for summary judgment in its favor on the ground…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Kocsis v. Chicago Park DistrictIllinois Supreme Court · 1935
- Town of Balkan v. Village of BuhlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
- Humboldt County v. Lander CountyNevada Supreme Court · 1899
- Knutson Hotel Corp. v. City of MoorheadSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
- State v. Republic Steel CorporationSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1937