Castner v. Castner
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, P. J.,
This appeal by the libellant is from the decree of the court below refusing to grant Mm a divorce on the ground of cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities after a master had made a report favorable to him. A master’s recommendation is advisory only, but as we have frequently said, it is entitled to, and we in the exercise of our independent judgment have given it, careful consideration: Philo v. Philo, 154 Pa. Superior Ct. 563, 36 A. 2d 833. In viewing this record it must be kept in mind that the burden rests upon the libellant to establish by clear and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Viney v. VineySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
- Crock v. CrockSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
- Philo v. PhiloSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Harding v. HardingSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Benjeski v. BenjeskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Stewart v. StewartSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Barnes v. BarnesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Blose v. BloseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Boggs v. BoggsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
- Anthony v. AnthonySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.