Philo v. Philo
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The libellant sought to obtain a divorce on the ground of cruel and barbarous treatment and indignities to the person. The master concluded that the charge of cruel and barbarous treatment was not sustained and recommended that a divorce be granted on the ground of indignities. Exceptions filed by the respondent were dismissed by the court below and a final decree was entered in accordance with the master’s report. Respondent appeals.
While we are not unmindful that the recommendations of a master are entitled to a careful consideration they are advisory only, not…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1933
- Sleight v. SleightSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- Mathias v. MathiasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Esenwein v. EsenweinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
- Viney v. VineySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Boyer v. BoyerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
- Rankin v. RankinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
- Wilson v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- McMahon v. McMahonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
- Castner v. CastnerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.