Legal Opinion
Aramburu v. Boeing Co.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided December 21, 1995No. 93-4064-SACPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
CROW, District Judge.
On March 22, 1993, the plaintiff, Santiago Aramburu, commenced this action against his former employer, The Boeing Company (Boeing), and his former supervisor, Larry Whitesell. Aramburu’s amended complaint seeks to recover damages and secure equitable relief to redress the deprivation of rights secured by the Civil Rights Act of 1991, Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, the Civil Rights Act of 1866, Title I of the American with Disabilities Act of 1990 (ADA), and the Kansas Act Against Discrimination (KAAD). The plaintiff claims that the…
2Cases cited58 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Aramburu v. The Boeing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Freeman v. KansasDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2001
- Hysten v. Jefferson County Board of County CommissionersDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1998
- Hiebert v. IFR Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1997