McMillan v. Wilson Company, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff brought this action to recover overtime pay under the fair labor standards act of 1938 (29 USCA, §§ 201-219) while employed by defendant. The court found for him, judgment was entered, and defendant appeals. No motion was made for amended findings or a new trial. The decisive questions are: (1) The sufficiency of the evidence to sustain the findings, and (2) sufficiency of the findings to sustain the conclusions of law.
The court found that between October 24, 1938, and June 17, 1939, plaintiff was employed by defendant at its St. Paul plant as a day…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lefevers v. General Export Iron & Metal Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 1941
- Fleming v. A. B. Kirschbaum Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1941
- Fleming v. Pearson Hardwood Flooring Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1941
- Williams v. General Mills, Inc.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1941
- Abroe v. Lindsay Bros. Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Overnight Motor Transportation Co. v. MisselSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Slover v. WathenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1944
- Burke v. Mesta MacH. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
- Brooks Packing Co. v. HenrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Black v. Roland Electrical Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1946
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.