Legal Opinion

Bennett v. Hannelore Enterprises, Ltd.

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 19, 2003No. CV-02-5082 (NGG)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum and Order

GARAUFIS, District Judge.

This is a diversity action for injuries allegedly sustained by Tressa Bennett, her then in útero children, and her husband, Paul Bennett. The injuries allegedly were sustained when Tressa Bennett consumed paté produced by Hannelore Enterprises, et al. (“defendants”) containing listeria mo-nocytogenes bacteria (“listeria bacteria”). The court now considers defendants’ Fed. R.Civ.P. 56 motion for summary judgment in which defendants argue that Tressa and Paul Bennett’s (“plaintiffs”) claims are barred by the applicable statute of limitations. At this…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Klaxon Co. v. Stentor Electric Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  4. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  5. Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Hughes Electronics Corp. v. Citibank DelawareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
  2. Lehman Bros. Holdings Inc. v. Universal American Mortgage Co.District Court, D. Colorado · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API