Legal Opinion

State v. Bell

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided July 6, 1977No. 764SC1017PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Judge.

The defendant brings forth twenty-nine assignments of error which he presents as nine arguments for our consideration. Both of defendant’s first two arguments pertain to the admission of narcotics agent Buchanan’s testimony and demonstration regarding the process of cutting, bagging, and mixing heroin. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting this evidence since there was no evidence adduced at trial to show that the defendant cut, bagged, or mixed the heroin in question. We disagree.

During his search of the motel room in which the defendant was arrested,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  2. State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
  3. State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  4. State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
  5. State v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API