State v. Bell
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
MARTIN, Judge.
The defendant brings forth twenty-nine assignments of error which he presents as nine arguments for our consideration. Both of defendant’s first two arguments pertain to the admission of narcotics agent Buchanan’s testimony and demonstration regarding the process of cutting, bagging, and mixing heroin. Defendant contends that the trial court erred in admitting this evidence since there was no evidence adduced at trial to show that the defendant cut, bagged, or mixed the heroin in question. We disagree.
During his search of the motel room in which the defendant was arrested,…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- State v. BaxterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. EdwardsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
- State v. BaxterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- State v. CovingtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
3Cited by1 opinion
- State v. RogersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979