Legal Opinion

Virgil v. Garlock, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1993No. 1313PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BECK, Judge.

In this asbestos personal injury action, the trial court granted defendant Garlock, Inc.’s pre-trial motion to dismiss on the ground that plaintiffs Virgil and Margaret Junge failed to meet their prima facie burden of proving that Garlock’s asbestos products caused Virgil Junge’s asbestosis. We reverse. 1

Virgil Junge was employed as a boiler and machinery technician and repairman by the United States Navy and the Philadelphia Naval Shipyard over a period of thirty years. During that time, he personally handled Garlock asbestos sheet gaskets, flanges and packing. These materials…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Marks v. TasmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Firing v. KephartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  3. Eckenrod v. GAF Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Scott v. PurcellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  5. Storm v. GoldenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
  2. Gregg v. VJ Auto Parts, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Coward v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Smalls v. Pittsburgh-Corning Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  5. Andaloro v. Armstrong World Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API