Barry v. Aetna Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Mr. Justice Ladner,
Plaintiffs brought an action in assumpsit on a fire insurance policy. This case has been tried three times. The first trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs. A new trial was granted. The second trial resulted in a directed verdict for the defendant. Again, a new trial was granted and at this trial a verdict was rendered for the plaintiffs and another new trial was granted. It is this last grant of a new trial which is assigned as error in the plaintiffs’ appeal now before us.
We must first observe that the trial judge did not base the grant of a new trial…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Lebanon Mutual Insurance v. Hoover, Hughes & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Long v. North British etc. Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
- Walker v. Lion Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896
3Cited by4 opinions
- Earnest v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
- Canadian Indemnity Company v. Leo TackeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
- Ostroff v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
- Independent Life & Accident Insurance v. WigginsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961