Legal Opinion

Barry v. Aetna Insurance Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided June 27, 1951No. Appeal, 63PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Ladner,

Plaintiffs brought an action in assumpsit on a fire insurance policy. This case has been tried three times. The first trial resulted in a verdict for the plaintiffs. A new trial was granted. The second trial resulted in a directed verdict for the defendant. Again, a new trial was granted and at this trial a verdict was rendered for the plaintiffs and another new trial was granted. It is this last grant of a new trial which is assigned as error in the plaintiffs’ appeal now before us.

We must first observe that the trial judge did not base the grant of a new trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lebanon Mutual Insurance v. Hoover, Hughes & Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
  2. Long v. North British etc. Ins.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1891
  3. Walker v. Lion Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1896

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Earnest v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1959
  2. Canadian Indemnity Company v. Leo TackeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. Ostroff v. Springfield Fire & Marine InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1952
  4. Independent Life & Accident Insurance v. WigginsAlabama Court of Appeals · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API