Legal Opinion

Klett v. Hickey

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 2, 1945No. Calendar No. 42,830Published

1Opinion of the CourtNorth, J.

Leave having first been granted, defendants have appealed in the nature of mandamus from an order for discovery made in the trial court on petition of plaintiff. After service of summons by which suit was started, defendants appeared and demanded a copy of the declaration. There was no demand for a bill of particulars. Plaintiff, whose suit is for commissions- claimed to have accrued to him under the terms of two written agreements with defendants, petitioned for and obtained the order of discovery of defendants’ books of accounts, papers and documents “showing all business done by said…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hallett v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Gemsa v. DornerMichigan Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Scarney v. ClarkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API