Legal Opinion

Noble v. Echo Lake Tavern, Inc.

New York Supreme Court

Decided August 27, 1931PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRogers, J.

The defendant’s record title does not give it the right to use the waters of Echo lake, except in the small portion included within the limits of the land described in the deed of Noble to Raymond, and except to take therefrom for domestic purposes water for use upon the acre parcel conveyed by the said deed and the two-acre parcel mentioned in the said deed and then owned by Eliza Ann Raymond, which lay just across the road from the acre parcel conveyed to her by Noble. The words in *428the Noble deed “ and far enough into said pond to furnish water ” imply a limitation that precludes the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. New York Rubber Co. v. RotheryNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
  2. Viele v. . JudsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Commonwealth Water Co. v. BrunnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  4. Calkins v. . HartNew York Court of Appeals · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Findley Lake Property Owners, Inc. v. Town of MinaNew York Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Slud v. Guild Properties, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1952
  3. Carlino v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1973
  4. Brant Lake Shores, Inc. v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Hammel v. Camp Ranger, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API