Legal Opinion
Slud v. Guild Properties, Inc.
New York Supreme Court
Decided March 26, 1952PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRoscos V. Elswobth, J.
Defendant Guild Properties, Inc. moved herein to dismiss the three causes of action set forth in the original complaint upon the ground that the same did not set forth facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action; to dismiss the first cause of action on the additional ground that it did not accrue within the time limited by law for the commencement of an action; and to drop Nathan Slud as a party plaintiff under rule 102 of the Rules of Civil Practice. An amended complaint was served after the defendant so moved and it was stipulated by the parties that the original motion be deemed…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Green v. BiddleSupreme Court of the United States · 1823
- Jacob & Youngs, Inc. v. KentNew York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Rothschild v. . Title Guarantee Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1912
- Kalmanash v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1943
- Wendell v. Van RensselaerNew York Court of Chancery · 1815
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Sperry Rand Corporation v. William R. Hill, Jr.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1966
- Biuso v. KurkillAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Kiamesha Development Corp. v. Guild Properties, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957
- Ley v. InnisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Rainbow Commercial Alliance, Inc. v. LicciardiCivil Court of the City of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.