Legal Opinion
Brant Lake Shores, Inc. v. Barton
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1970PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCarrol S. Walsh, J.
Plaintiff seeks judgment declaring it to be the owner in fee simple absolute, free and clear from any claim of the defendants and each of them, in certain premises *903situate in the Town of Horicon, Warren County, New York, bordering on Brant Lake, part of Lot No. 176 of the Brant Lake Tract, particularly as to that part of the premises consisting of the beach area lying between the State highway, which intersects the premises, and the lake, and lands lying under the waters of Brant Lake to the extent established by the proof. Defendants Barton deny the title and rights of plaintiff in and to…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hardin v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Di Leo v. Pecksto Holding Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1952
- Gouverneur v. National Ice Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Stewart v. . TurneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Miller v. . Long Island Railroad Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Knapp v. HughesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Carlino v. BartonNew York Supreme Court · 1973
- Ray v. Beacon Hudson Mountain Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994