Legal Opinion

Mannillo v. Gorski

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 14, 1968PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

100 N.J. Super. 140 (1968)

241 A.2d 276

FRED MANNILLO AND ALICE MANNILLO, PLAINTIFFS,

v.

MARGARET GORSKI, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division.

Decided March 14, 1968.

Mr. George E. Ostrov attorney for plaintiffs.

Mr. Theodore D. Parsons, Jr. attorney for defendant (Messrs. Parsons, Canzona, Blair & Warren, attorneys).

LANE, J.S.C.

At the conclusion of the final hearing, the Court made certain findings of fact and rendered judgment for the defendant that she had acquired ownership by adverse possession of a strip of land 15 inches in width running the length of her west boundary,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. French v. PearceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831
  2. Norgard v. Busher Et UxOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Plaza v. FlakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  4. Caufield v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Predham v. HolfesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Russ v. Metropolitan Life Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  3. Caldwell v. Township of Rochelle ParkNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. In re the Seized Firearms Identification Card of HandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
  5. Rabon v. Rowan Memorial Hospital IncorporatedSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API