Legal Opinion

Kentucky v. United States Ex Rel. Hangel

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 21, 2014No. 12-6610PublishedCited by 105 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KAREN NELSON MOORE, Circuit Judge.

The Randolph-Sheppard Act (“the Act”), ch. 638, 49 Stat. 1559 (1936) (codified at 20 U.S.C. §§ 107-107e), gives blind persons a priority in winning contracts to operate vending facilities on federal properties. One of these properties is Fort Campbell in Kentucky, which operates a cafeteria for its soldiers. For at least the last two decades, Kentucky’s Office for the Blind (“OFB”) has helped blind vendors apply for and win the base’s contracts for various services. In 2012, the United States Army (“the Army”), the federal entity that operates Fort…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  2. Arbaugh v. Y & H Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
  3. Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Spencer v. KemnaSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  5. Lexmark Int'l, Inc. v. Static Control Components, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by105 opinions

  1. Kerr Ex Rel. Kerr v. Commissioner of Social SecurityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2017
  2. Melissa Wilson v. Darin GordonCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  3. In re 2016 Primary ElectionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2016
  4. Commonwealth of Ky. v. Joseph R. BidenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  5. Planet Aid v. City of St. Johns, MICourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2015

100 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API