Legal Opinion

Chaddick v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided March 28, 1923No. 6915PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFly, C. J.

This is a suit on a promissory note for $1,245 executed by H. E. Sanders on September 1,1920, and indorsed and payment guaranteed, in consideration of an extension, by E. O. Sanders on November 18, 1920, and to foreclose a certain chattel mortgage on a Hudson four-passenger speedster. Appellant, as plaintiff, claimed, in addition to the amount of the note, $10 for automobile ac cessories purchased by H. E. Sanders. Ap-pellees answered by general demurrer and general denial, pleaded at great length fraud and misrepresentation, and set up a cross-action. The cause was submitted to a jury on…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seeligson v. Lewis & WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Wiggins v. BissoTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Foster v. BeallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  4. Goode v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922
  5. Overland Sales Co. v. PierceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1920

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hennessy v. Automobile Owners' Ins.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  2. Elder Chevrolet Co. v. Bailey County Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1941
  3. Amarillo Oil Co. v. Ranch Creek Oil & Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
  4. Cullum v. Lub-Tex Motor Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  5. Hennessy v. Automobile Owners' Ins.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API