Legal Opinion

In re Teschmacher & Mrazay

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided February 29, 1904No. 1,848PublishedCited by 10 opinions

In Bankruptcy.

1Opinion of the Court

J. B. McPHERSON, District Judge.

The act of bankruptcy charged in the creditors’ petition is the transfer, by bill of sale and actual delivery, of the stock and book accounts of a fur store to Andrew Gerenday, the son-in-law of one of the bankrupts, with intent to hinder, *729delay, and defraud creditors; or, in the alternative, the transfer of the stock and accounts while the bankrupts were insolvent, with intent to give Gerenday a preference. The transfer was made on December 31, 1903, and the petition in bankruptcy was fded on January 35. Three days later a restraining order was issued, after…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Bardes v. Hawarden BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Jaquith v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1903

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re RidingUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Utah · 1984
  2. In re BaconCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  3. In re BallouDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1914
  4. In re HaydenDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1908
  5. In re LummusDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API