In re Lummus
District Court, N.D. Georgia
In Bankruptcy. In the matter of W. A. Lummus, bankrupt. On application for a summary order to require Gus Coggins to deliver property to receivers. Denied.
1Opinion of the Court
NEWMAN, District Judge.
The facts in this case are that certain creditors of W. A. Lummus and persons interested were having a conference in Atlanta as to the advisability of putting Lummus into bankruptcy, with every indication that they would endeavor to do so. About this time, Coggins, who had been absent out West in connec*892tion with his mule business, arrived in Atlanta and was informed of what was going on. During the day he paid to a bank in Atlanta a note for $1,000 on which he was an indorser for Lummus. He claims that Lummus owed him this $1,000 and a considerable amount in addition…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Mueller v. NugentSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Louisville Trust Co. v. ComingorSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Jaquith v. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- In re FriedmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
- In re Teschmacher & MrazayDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1904
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Berliner v. Leung Din LumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1939
- American Trust & Savings Bank v. RuppeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1916
- In re VallozzaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1915
- Schaffer v. HughesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- Franceschi v. Sociedad Civil AgrícolaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.