Legal Opinion
Olsen v. Kidman
Utah Supreme Court
Decided September 18, 1951No. 7642PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*445WOLFE, Chief Justice.
The defendant Leslie J. Kidman, doing business as Perry Realty, claims that he has a valid equitable lien upon plaintiff’s real property for the amount of his commission, earned by procuring a purchaser for the property. The plaintiff contends that the lien is invalid and the filing thereof constitutes slander of title, for which this action is brought. On February 7, 1950, the plaintiff signed the listing agreement which provided:
“Perry Eealty:
“In consideration of your agreement to list the property described below, I hereby agree:
“1. To give you the exclusive right to…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Gudger v. MantonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Moss v. SperrySupreme Court of Florida · 1939
- Dowse v. Doris Trust Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1949
- Utah Apex Mining Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1949
- Francis v. WellsSupreme Court of Colorado · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Den-Gar Enterprises v. RomeroNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1980
- D. K. Porter, Trustee in Bankruptcy of Abe Greenband v. Woodey B. Searle and Edlean E. SearleCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
- Howarth v. OstergaardUtah Supreme Court · 1973
- Dupuy v. Western State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1985
- Home Investments Fund v. RobertsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.