Great American Insurance v. Holiday Motors of High Point, Inc.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Defendant’s failure to demand a jury trial, as provided by G.S. 1-539.5, constituted a waiver of that right. The facts found by the court are amply supported by the evidence. They are conclusive and binding on us. Johnson v. Johnson, 262 N.C. 39, 136 S.E. 2d 230. The exception to the judgment raises the question: Are the facts found sufficient to support the judgment? The answer is “yes.” The rule of law applicable to the facts of this case is well stated in 10 Am. Jur. 2d 573. It is there said:
“The responsibility of the drawee who pays a forged check, for the genuineness of the drawer’s…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- National Bank of North America v. BangsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- First National Bank of Danvers v. First National Bank of SalemMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1890
- First Nat. Bank v. United States Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
- Woodward v. Savings & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1919
- Louisa National Bank v. Kentucky National BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1931
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Quadrant Corporation v. City of KinstonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1974
- Pendergrass v. MassengillSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967