Legal Opinion

Quadrant Corporation v. City of Kinston

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1974No. 748SC215PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAUGHN, Judge.

Defendants except to the entry of the judgment and argue, in effect, that the judgment is based on erroneous conclusions of law. With respect to defendant Hill, the court determined that “the Building Inspector should have issued such permit forthwith upon the application made to him. ...” This conclusion is supported by the facts found and admitted. Manufacturing Co. v. Clayton, Acting Comr. of Revenue, 265 N.C. 165, 143 S.E. 2d 113; Insurance Co. v. Motors, 264 N.C. 444, 142 S.E. 2d 13. The court found and defendants admitted that applicable zoning restrictions permitted the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Yancey v. HeafnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  2. County of Durham v. AddisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Application of Rea Construction CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  4. Mitchell v. BarfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  5. Aberfoyle Manufacturing Company v. ClaytonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Sansotta v. Town of Nags HeadDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2012
  2. Nazziola v. Landcraft Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001
  3. United States v. Town of Garner, North CarolinaDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2010
  4. Sanco of Wilmington Service Corp. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. Jones v. DavisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API