Legal Opinion

Louisa National Bank v. Kentucky National Bank

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided May 26, 1931PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Richardson

Affirming.

This action is by the Kentucky National Bank, the drawee of a check for $600, against the holder, the Louisa National Bank, which paid the check to the payee, Fred Banfield, a stranger, without inquiry, and without requiring his identification. The action was tried by the court without the intervention of a jury on an agreed statement of facts. The judgment was for the Kentucky National Bank, and the Louisa National Bank appeals.

As a matter of brevity and convenience, we will designate them herein as the Bank of Kentucky and the Bank of Louisa.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Figuers v. FlyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  2. First Nat. Bank v. United States Nat. BankOregon Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Farmers' & Merchants' Bank v. Bank of RutherfordTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  4. National Bank of Commerce v. Mechanics' American National BankMissouri Court of Appeals · 1910
  5. Farmers National Bank v. Farmers & Traders BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. American National Bank v. First National BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1954
  2. Union Central Life Ins. Co. v. GlasscockCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1937
  3. American National Bank and Trust Company of Bowling Green, Kentucky v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  4. Union Oil Co. of Calif. v. LullOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Kansas Bankers Surety Co. v. Ford County State BankSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API