Legal Opinion

Long v. Standard Oil Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 16, 1949No. Civ. 16672PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShinn, P. J.

Plaintiff was awarded judgment on a verdict for damages resulting from the drowning of his 4-year-old son. Defendant’s motion for new trial was granted and plaintiff appeals from the order.

The order granting a new trial did not specify insufficiency of the evidence as one of the grounds. The trial judge stated in a memorandum of his ruling, and an entry in the minutes of the department clerk also stated, that the order was granted upon the ground that an instruction that was given was deemed to be erroneous and prejudicial to the defendant.

The contentions of the parties are the following;…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. S. Pac. Co.California Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Demmer v. City of EurekaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
  3. Hackel v. Los Angeles RailwayCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
  4. Spaulding v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Blaylock v. JensenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. People v. KirkesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Reynolds v. WillsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1958
  3. Copfer v. GoldenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  4. Garcia v. SoogianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Ford v. CHESLEY TRANSPORTATION CO. INC.California Court of Appeal · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API