Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Endicott Johnson Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided August 19, 1941PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
A hearing has been had in conformity with my decision. D.C., 37 F.Supp. 604. The present issue is whether or not an order, directing defendants to obey an administrative subpcena duces tecum, should issue.
*255My decision (supra) sets forth the facts leading up to the controversy in sufficient detail to obviate the necessity, except in a few instances, of a re-statement.
The Endicott-Johnson Corporation is an integrated industry. It is plaintiff’s contention that all of the corporation’s factories and departments, regardless of where located and how operated, wherein…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tung Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. New England Transp. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1936
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1941
3Cited by5 opinions
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- United States v. Russell Electric Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Board of Review v. WilliamsMississippi Supreme Court · 1943
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943