Legal Opinion
Perkins v. Endicott Johnson Corp.
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided February 1, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRYANT, District Judge.
This' is a proceeding to obtain an order of the Court directing the Endicott Johnson Corporation and its Secretary to obey certain subpoenas duces tecum issued by the Secretary of Labor in an administrative proceeding under the Act of June 30, 1936, 49 Statutes 2036, known as the Walsh-Healey Public Contracts Act, 41 U.S.C.A. § 35 et seq. Jurisdiction to issue such an order is provided by Section 5 of the Act.
Plaintiff maintains that the Court has power, in a summary proceeding, to grant the requested order. However, to avoid any question of procedural irregularity, she…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Tung Corp. of AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1940
- National Labor Relations Board v. New England Transp. Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1936
- National Labor Relations Board v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1940
3Cited by6 opinions
- Endicott Johnson Corp. v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- Peoples Natural Gas Co. v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
- General Tobacco & Grocery Co. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942
- Perkins v. Endicott Johnson Corp.District Court, N.D. New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.