Legal Opinion

Charles H. McCauley Associates v. Snook

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided November 24, 1976PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This appeal by McCauley Associates, Inc., challenges an adverse interpretation of a buy-sell agreement whereby the trial Judge awarded Eula M. Snook, the widow and personal representative of Charles Snook, the deceased president of McCauley, a judgment for the adjusted book value of the stock, plus life insurance proceeds.

The Facts

Five employees of Charles H. McCauley Associates, including Mr. Snook, purchased the defendant corporation soon after Mr. McCauley's death in 1971 by paying $9,200 each and borrowing in the name of the corporation an additional $800,000. Their personal guaranty of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lowery v. MaySupreme Court of Alabama · 1925
  2. Sisco v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle MinaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1970
  3. City of Fairhope v. Town of DaphneSupreme Court of Alabama · 1968
  4. Merchants' Nat. Bank of Mobile v. HubbardSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  5. City of Albany v. SpraginsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Beaver Const. Co. v. Lakehouse, LLCSupreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  2. Harold Allen's Mobile Home Factory Outlet, Inc. v. EarlySupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
  3. Smiths Water Auth. v. City of Phenix CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  4. State Ex Rel. Riley v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2008
  5. Thyssenkrupp Steel USA, LLC v. United Forming, Inc.District Court, S.D. Alabama · 2013

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API