Sisco v. Empiregas, Inc. of Belle Mina
Supreme Court of Alabama
1Opinion of the Court
BLOODWORTH, Justice.
This is an appeal by respondents, Sisco and Jordan from a decree overruling demurrers to a bill seeking an injunction to enforce a “non-competition” provision in an employment contract, denying a motion to dissolve a temporary injunction, ánd granting a permanent injunction.
The bill of complaint filed by complainant, Empiregas, Inc. of Belle Mina, seeks to: enforce by injunction the “non-competition” provision .in the employment contract, and to enjoin respondent “Jack Jordan, d/b/a Jordan Gas Company”' from participating with respondent Sisco in selling and distributing…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arkansas Valley Smelting Co. v. Belden Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1888
- Orkin Exterminating Company v. BurnettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Smith, Bell & Hauck, Inc. v. CullinsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1962
- Abalene Pest Control Service, Inc. v. HallSupreme Court of Vermont · 1966
- Schweiger v. HochDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Hess v. Gebhard & Co. Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Food Service Distributors, Inc. v. BarberSupreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- Traffic Control Services, Inc. v. United Rentals Northwest, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 2004
- Smith v. CITICORP PERSON-TO-PERSON FINANCIAL CENTERSSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985
- Universal Underwriters Ins. Co. v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Alabama · 2000
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.