Legal Opinion

Combined Communications Corporation Nashville Banner Publishing Company, Cross-Appellees v. United States Postal Service, Cross-Appellant

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided December 15, 1989No. 88-5817, 88-5819PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOYCE F. MARTIN, Jr., Circuit Judge.

Combined Communications Corp. and the Nashville Banner Publishing Co. appeal the judgment of the district court denying them a postal refund for the payment of third-class rates for second-class mail. The United States Postal Service appeals the judgment of the district court finding its promulgation and implementation of Domestic Mail Manual § 425.226 to be an ultra vires act. For the reasons stated below we affirm the judgment of the district court.

I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND

In 1986 Combined Communications Corp., a subsidiary of Gannett Co., Inc., published a…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  2. National Ass'n of Postal Supervisors v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
  3. United Parcel Service, Inc., a New York Corporation, and United Parcel Service, Inc., and Ohio Corporation v. United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979
  4. National Retired Teachers Ass'n v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1977
  5. United Parcel Service, Inc. v. United States Portal ServiceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Pitney Bowes Inc. v. United States Postal ServiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1998
  2. Snap-Drape v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995
  3. Sidney Coal Co., Inc. v. MassanariDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2002
  4. Combined Communications Corporation Nashville Banner Publishing Company, Cross-Appellees v. United States Postal Service, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  5. Snap-Drape v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API