Legal Opinion

Snap-Drape v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided July 13, 1995No. Docket No. 2174-93PublishedCited by 23 opinions

During taxable year 1990, P made contributions to its ESOP in the amount of $ 240,732 and claimed a deduction for the entire amount under sec. 404(a), I.R.C.

Read the full summary

During taxable year 1990, P made contributions to its ESOP in the amount of $ 240,732 and claimed a deduction for the entire amount under sec. 404(a), I.R.C. P also paid to the ESOP a cash dividend with respect to its common stock in the amount of $ 1,440,000. The ESOP transferred the entire amount of the dividend to the Bank as payment of interest and principal under a note, executed for purposes of purchasing securities of P. On its 1990 Federal income tax return, P claimed a deduction with respect to the cash dividend paid to the ESOP in the amount of $ 1,440,000 under sec. 404(k), I.R.C.…

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Wright, Judge:

Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner’s Federal income tax for taxable year 1990 in the amount of $239,463.

After concessions by the parties, the issues for our consideration are as follows:(1) Whether dividends paid to an employee stock ownership plan, deductible under section 404(k),1 are deductible under section 56(g)(4)(C)(i) in computing the adjusted current earnings of a corporation for purposes of determining alternative minimum tax, and thus, whether section 1.56(g)-1(d)(3)(iii)(E), Income Tax Regs., is valid. We hold that the section 404(k) dividends…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. New Colonial Ice Co. v. HelveringSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Rowan Cos. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. Joseph R. Dileo, Mary A. Dileo, Walter E. Mycek, Jr., Michele A. Mycek and Arcelo Reproduction Company, Inc. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
  5. Anderson, Clayton & Co., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. Hospital Corp. of Am. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1997
  2. Schuler Industries, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
  3. O'Donnabhain v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2010
  4. Kreit Mechanical Associates, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 2011
  5. Sunoco, Inc. v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2002

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API