Legal Opinion

United States v. David Rivera

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 22, 2012No. 10-50426PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

Defendant-Appellant David Rivera was convicted of possessing with intent to distribute 214.4 grams of actual methamphetamine. Defense counsel indicated that Rivera wanted his family members, including his wife and young son, present at the sentencing hearing. The district court, however, expressing displeasure at what it perceived as the manipulative use of Rivera’s young son as a sentencing “prop,” continued the sentencing hearing and ordered defense counsel to show up three days later with “[jjust the people involved.” We hold that Rivera’s Sixth Amendment right…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. In Re OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  2. Waller v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Mempa v. RhaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. United States v. CartyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Alejandro Velazquez v. City of Long BeachCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. Patrick Neiss v. Pete BludworthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
  3. United States v. John DoeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. MikhelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. Peyronel, Bobby JoeCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2015

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API