Legal Opinion

Plank v. Summers

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 13, 1954No. [No. 45, October Term, 1954.]PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHenderson, J.

On the former appeal in this case, Plank v. Summers, 203 Md. 552, we held that the trial court erred in limiting to pain and suffering the damages recoverable by three members of the United States Navy, for injuries sustained in an automobile accident. We remanded the case “for the purpose of allowing the value of the hospital and medical services, rendered to the appellants by the United States Government, to be added to the amounts of the judgments.” We also stated (p. 556) that the principal question before us was “whether the jury should have been allowed to consider and to award the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. Standard Oil Co. Of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  2. United States v. GilmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. Bell v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1951
  4. Nelson v. SeilerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1927
  5. Plank v. SummersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1954

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Martens Chevrolet, Inc. v. SeneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  2. State v. FrazierCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  3. State v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Boone v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1967
  5. Commission on Medical Discipline v. StillmanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API