Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Aho

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 19, 1980No. 35,474; SPCM 12752; No. 36,413; CM 437070; No. 36,834; CM 436534PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

2Per curiam

We granted review in each of the above-styled cases to consider appellant’s contention that the court-martial which tried him was constituted contrary to the provisions of Article 25, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 825. All the appellants requested trial with enlisted members. Appellants Manuel and Aho now assert that enlisted personnel below the grade of E-6 were excluded from consideration as court members, and appellant Hale asserts that personnel below the grade of E-5 were excluded. This issue of exclusion was not raised before the trial judge in any of…

3Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. GaleSupreme Court of the United States · 1883
  3. United States v. CrawfordUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1964
  4. Coleman v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. United States v. GreeneUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1970

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. MarshUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  2. United States v. CherryUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1982
  3. United States v. McGeeU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1983
  4. United States v. BeardU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1983
  5. United States v. AndersonU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API