Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States v. Anderson

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided March 17, 1981No. ACM S24849Published

1DissentMahoney, Judge

(dissenting): •

The issue in this case is the definition of the term “unit” for purposes of determining enlisted member eligibility for service upon courts-martial. In Article 25 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, Congress partially defined the term by listing the maximum size of a “unit.” The Code dele*806gates to the Secretaries of the respective services the authority to complete the definition. With guidance from the President, paragraph 4b, Manual for Courts-Martial 1969 (Rev.), the Secretary oí the Air Force has completed the definition of the term “unit” for the Air Force. I find that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States v. BrownU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1980
  2. United States v. AhoUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API