Legal Opinion

Pharr v. Canal Insurance

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided July 15, 1958No. 17449PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Moss, Justice.

Canal Insurance Company, the appellant herein, did, on September 27, 1951, issue to Roosevelt Bush an automobile liability policy covering one Ford truck, with limits of liability as to bodily injuries of $5,000.00 for each person and $10,000.00 for each accident. Canal Insurance Com pany agreed to pay in behalf of the insured all sums which the insured shall become legally obligated to pay as damages because of bodily injuries sustained by any person caused by accident and arising out of the ownership and maintenance or use of the insured truck. While the policy was in full…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Tweeddale v. TweeddaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1903
  2. Severson v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. MacClure v. Accident & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  4. Johnston-Crews Co. v. FolkSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1922
  5. American Fire and Casualty Company v. VlietSupreme Court of Florida · 1941

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Clemmer v. Hartford Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Rampy v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Ins. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Shapiro v. Republic Indemnity Co. of AmericaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Broz v. WinlandOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Singleton Ex Rel. SingletonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1994

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API