Legal Opinion

Vermont Mutual Insurance v. Singleton Ex Rel. Singleton

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 20, 1994No. 24105PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Toal, Justice:

This appeal arises from the special referee’s order of insurance coverage in a declaratory judgment action. We affirm.

FACTS

The insurance policy being construed is a voluntary homeowners policy which contains coverage for “bodily injury . . . caused by activities of the insured” but contains an exclusion for “bodily injury ... which is expected or intended by the insured.” This is commonly referred to as the “intentional act exclusion.” The Appellant, Vermont Mutual Insurance Co. (hereinafter Vermont), brought this declaratory judgment action on September 21, 1990, to determine…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Breland v. SchillingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
  2. Allstate Insurance v. NovakNebraska Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Snakenberg v. Hartford Casualty Ins. Co., Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989
  4. South Carolina Medical Malpractice Liability Insurance Joint Underwriting Ass'n v. FerrySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1987
  5. Squires v. National Grange Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1965

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. PAJ, Inc. v. Hanover Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Alcazar v. HayesTennessee Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Norris Ex Rel. Thomas v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2000
  4. Prince George's County v. Local Government Insurance TrustCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. Farmers & Mechanics Mutual Insurance Co. of West Virginia v. CookWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2001

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API