Legal Opinion

Broz v. Winland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 1994No. 92-2370PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Francis E. Sweeney, Sr., J.

The legal issue we are asked to decide is whether a determination made in a declaratory judgment action between an insurance company and its insureds binds persons injured by the insured’s negligence who are not parties to the declaratory judgment action. For the reasons which follow, we hold that injured persons not parties to a separate declaratory judgment action are not bound by such decision, and thus are not precluded from litigating the issue of insurance coverage in an R.C. 3929.06 supplemental proceeding.

I

American States obtained a declaratory judgment…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Goodson v. McDonough Power Equipment, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Whitehead v. General Telephone Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Preferred Risk Insurance v. GillOhio Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Luntz v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Conold v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Bayshore Ford Trucks Sales, Inc. v. Ford Motor Co.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  2. Sanderson v. Ohio Edison Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Phillips v. RayburnOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  4. City of Whitehall ex rel. Wolfe v. Ohio Civil Rights CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Keeton v. Telemedia Co. of Southern OhioOhio Court of Appeals · 1994

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API