Fuchs v. Scripps Howard Broadcasting Co.
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Mark P. Painter, Judge.
{¶ 1} The media has great freedom in this country because we value its watchdog role. Yet the public’s right to know must be balanced by an individual’s privacy interests — and it is where these intersect that the courts must be careful to balance both interests.
{¶ 2} Here, a TV station did investigative reporting. It was sued for defamation. We hold that the trial court was correct in granting summary judgment to the station because it acted reasonably.
I. The Investigation
{¶ 3} Plaintiff-appellant J. Michael Fuchs, D.D.S., Inc., d.b.a. Family Dental Care Associates…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Temple v. Wean United, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1977
- Hutchinson v. ProxmireSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Yeager v. Local Union 20, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers of AmericaOhio Supreme Court · 1983
- Doe v. ShafferOhio Supreme Court · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gilson v. Am. Inst. of Alternative MedicineOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
- Croce v. N.Y. Times Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2018
- Bamcor LLC v. Jupiter Aluminum Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2011
- Ehrlich v. KovackDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2015
- Boddie v. LandersOhio Court of Appeals · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.