Legal Opinion

State of Kansas v. Stoffel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1892PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Appeal from Seward District Court. The material facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Johnston, J.:

John Stoffel was prosecuted upon a charge of robbery, and convicted of grand larceny. He appeals, and his first ground of error is that the original complaint filed before the magistrate charged him with stealing the animal “lawfully” instead of “unlawfully;” and hence he urges that no crime was committed, and no reason exists for his arrest or prosecution. The word “lawfully” is the one used in the record, but, from the other terms employed in describing the offense, it would appear that this defect was a clerical error. However, it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  2. Redmond v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  3. State v. JenkinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  4. State v. HuberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re TalleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1910
  2. State v. ArmstrongOregon Supreme Court · 1903
  3. State v. LongstrethNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1909
  4. State v. HowlandSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  5. State v. JonesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API