State v. Armstrong
Oregon Supreme Court
From Baker: Robert Eakin, J udge. Pleasant Armstrong appeals from a judgment of death following a conviction of murder.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolverton
The defendant appeals from a judgment of the circuit court, rendered upon a verdict convicting him of murder in the first degree. There are three principal assignments of error touching the rulings of the trial court, namely, in refusing to grant a change of venue, in disallowing defendant’s challenge for cause to certain jurors, and in orally commenting upon and explaining certain instructions given in writing at the request of the defendant. Other assignments are noted, but are not especially insisted upon, and need but casual examination.
1. The crime of which defendant was convicted -was…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Hopt v. PeopleSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- State v. McDanielOregon Supreme Court · 1901
- State v. SaundersOregon Supreme Court · 1886
- O'Donnell v. SegarMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
- State v. PomeroyOregon Supreme Court · 1896
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- State v. NefstadOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- North v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1952
- Multnomah County v. Willamette Towing Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. MegordenOregon Supreme Court · 1907
- State v. RathieOregon Supreme Court · 1921
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.