Legal Opinion

State v. New York-Mexican Oil Co.

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided March 20, 1923No. 176PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rodney, J.,

delivering the opinion of the court:

In this case a petition was filed for a writ of mandamus to do two things: (1) to compel the defendant company to transfer on its books the stock in controversy to the name of the relator; and (2) to issue to the relator a new certificate for the shares so transferred.

Before taking up the two objects of the application, it may not be improper to set out some general principles governing the writ of mandamus as existing in Delaware so as to apply them to this case.

In England, prior to the statute of Anne, the writ was a prerogative one, so called…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Brumley v. Jessup & Moore Paper Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1910
  2. Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
  3. Fowler v. DicksonSuperior Court of Delaware · 1909
  4. Durham v. Monumental Silver Mining Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1880
  5. People ex rel. Adams v. Goss & Phillips Manufacturing Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1881

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
  2. Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  3. In re Canal Constuction Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936
  4. Chadwick v. Parkhill Corp.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1928
  5. Bankers' Mortgage Co. v. SohlandSuperior Court of Delaware · 1927

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API