Legal Opinion

Chadwick v. Parkhill Corp.

Court of Chancery of Delaware

Decided March 28, 1928PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor.

There are two matters before the court. The first is the preliminary one of whether the motions should be granted which were presented by Gill’s solicitor to the effect *108that the case be opened for the taking of testimony by Gill at some indefinite time in the future, or, failing that, that the court defer decision of the intervention controversy until the return of a commission issued to a solicitor in England for the taking of medical testimony upon the alleged inability of Gill to attend in this court on January 25th last. If these motions be refused, the second matter before…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1916
  2. State v. New York-Mexican Oil Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1923
  3. Allen v. StewartCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1895

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Salt Dome Oil Corp. v. SchenckSupreme Court of Delaware · 1945
  2. In re Giant Portland Cement Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1941
  3. Southern Production Co. v. SabathSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  4. Spoturno v. WoodsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1937
  5. In re Canal Constuction Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API