Legal Opinion

Chulsky v. Hudson Law Offices, PC

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 10, 2011No. Civil 10-3058 (FLW)PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WOLFSON, District Judge:

Presently before the Court is Defendants Hudson Law Offices (“Hudson Law”) and Lauri A. Hudson a/k/a Lauri A. Hudson, Esq. (“Hudson”) (collectively, “Defendants”) motion to dismiss, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), this putative class action brought by Plaintiff Marjorie Chulsky (“Plaintiff’ or “Chulsky”). Plaintiffs claims arise of out of Hudson Law’s purchase of, and attempts to collect, a consumer debt. Defendants seek to dismiss all of the claims asserted in Plaintiffs Complaint, which claims are brought under the Fair Debt Collection…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. Fowler v. UPMC SHADYSIDECourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Dunn v. Global Trust Management, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  2. McIntosh v. Global Trust Management, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  3. OZTURK v. AMSHER COLLECTION SERVICES, INC.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API