Legal Opinion
Wortham v. Integrated Health Services
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided February 13, 2004No. 3:02CV7474PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CARR, District Judge.
This is an employment discrimination ease in which the plaintiff, Vanessa Wort-ham, alleges that her employer, defendant Integrated Health Services, discriminated against her on the basis of her age and race. This court has federal question jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331. Pending is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. For the following reasons, defendant’s motion shall be granted.
BACKGROUND
The plaintiff, Vanessa Wortham, is a forty-eight year old, African-American fe male. She was employed by the Waterford Commons Nursing Center, which at all relevant…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Motoyama v. Hawaii, Department of TransportationDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2012
- Brown v. Ohio State UniversityDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2009
- Murray v. University Hospitals Cleveland Medical CenterDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023
- Phipps v. Wieland Chase, LLCDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2024
- Sharqawi v. Kirby CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2023