Legal Opinion
Jackson v. Birmingham Board of Education
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 21, 2002No. 02-11303PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
Roderick Jackson appeals the dismissal of his complaint alleging that the Birmingham Board of Education (the “Board”) retaliated against him in violation of Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 (“Title IX”), 20 U.S.C. § 1681 et seq., and the regulations implementing it. While employed by the Board as the coach of a girl’s basketball team, Jackson complained about practices that he believed discriminated against his team in violation of Title IX. The school, he maintains, retaliated against him by removing him from his coaching position. The question before us is…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Cannon v. University of ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Gonzaga University v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Alexander v. SandovalSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Sandra Jackson v. BellSouth TelecommunicationsCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
- Jackson v. Birmingham Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Shotz v. City of Plantation, FLCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
- Peters v. JenneyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Cynthia Love v. Delta Air LinesCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2002
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.