Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 18, 2000No. H021486; No. H021543PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAMATTRE-MANOUKIAN, J.

Allen Douglas Butler and Michael Thomas Cheek were found to be sexually violent predators under the Sexually Violent Predators Act (Welf. & Inst. Code, § 6600 et seq.)1 and were committed to the custody of the state Department of Mental Health (DMH) for two years. We affirmed those commitments in People v. Butler (1998) 68 *955Cal.App.4th 421 [80 Cal.Rptr.2d 357] (Butler I),2 and People v. Cheek (1999) 75 Cal.App.4th 282 [89 Cal.Rptr.2d 125] (Cheek), review granted December 15, 1999, S083305.

Before Butler’s and Cheek’s initial two-year commitments expired, the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Hubbart v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  2. People v. JeffersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
  4. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  5. Butler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. People v. HubbartCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  2. People v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  3. In Re WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
  4. People v. Superior Court (Gary)California Court of Appeal · 2000
  5. People v. WardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API